The accused, charged with second-degree murder, applied for bail in a reverse onus situation.
The proposed release plan involved house arrest with electronic monitoring and his father as a surety.
The court dismissed the application, finding the accused failed to meet his onus on the primary, secondary, and tertiary grounds.
The court noted the accused's history of breaching court orders, fleeing the jurisdiction under a false name, and committing violent offences while on bail or in custody, concluding that electronic monitoring could not overcome the lack of a reliable supervision plan.