The applicants, pharmacists facing discipline proceedings, sought judicial review of an interlocutory decision by the Discipline Committee denying their motion for extensive disclosure of third-party medical and billing records.
The Divisional Court declined to hear the application, finding it premature.
The court reiterated that judicial review of interlocutory administrative decisions is only available in exceptional circumstances or where jurisdiction is irretrievably lost.
Finding no denial of natural justice and noting that extensive disclosure had already been provided, the court quashed the application.
