The appellant was convicted of aggravated assault in relation to severe injuries suffered by his one-month-old baby.
At trial, the identity of the assailant was the central issue, with the appellant denying responsibility and pointing to the child's mother.
The trial judge convicted the appellant based on circumstantial evidence and alleged admissions.
On appeal, the Court of Appeal found that the trial judge failed to properly apply the W. (D.) framework regarding reasonable doubt and credibility, and failed to provide adequate reasons for rejecting the appellant's evidence.
The conviction was quashed and a new trial ordered.
