The applicant insurer sought a stay of Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) proceedings pending a judicial review of the LAT's refusal to adjourn a hearing date.
Neither counsel for the applicant nor the respondent were available for the scheduled hearing dates.
The LAT opposed the stay and argued the judicial review was premature.
The single judge of the Divisional Court adjourned the stay motion to a full panel, noting the motion's outcome would likely resolve the underlying judicial review.
