The respondents in a defamation appeal brought a motion for security for costs and an interlocutory injunction against the appellant.
The Divisional Court granted the motion for security for costs, finding the appeal appeared frivolous and vexatious, and the appellant likely had insufficient assets to pay costs.
The appellant was ordered to post $10,000.
The motion for an injunction to prevent alleged harassing behaviour was dismissed because there was no pending or intended proceeding claiming a permanent injunction.
