This decision addresses a long motion in a high-conflict family litigation case between a mother and father concerning parenting and support.
The mother withdrew her application and refused to participate in the father's motion, even attempting to call the police in court.
The court heard the father's unopposed motion, dismissing many of his requests due to lack of jurisdiction (e.g., child welfare-like orders, compelling a "Miglin Release") or insufficient evidence (e.g., sole decision-making, imputed income, life insurance).
The court ordered the continuation of the existing week-about parenting schedule, mandated both parents' participation in previously ordered custody/access and mental health assessments, and prohibited both parties from bringing any further motions without leave due to their history of abusive litigation conduct.
The court also cancelled a matrimonial home designation on the paternal grandfather's property.
No costs were awarded, as the judge found both parties contributed to the litigation's chaos.
