The applicant, Marshall Kazman, a disbarred lawyer charged with multiple counts of fraud, possession of proceeds of crime, and committing an offence for the benefit of a criminal organization, sought a Rowbotham order for state-funded legal counsel.
The Crown resisted the application.
The court applied the three-part test for a Rowbotham order: (1) ineligibility for or refusal of legal aid, (2) indigence, and (3) material compromise of the right to a fair trial without counsel.
The court found that Kazman was responsible for Legal Aid Ontario's refusal due to non-cooperation, failed to convincingly demonstrate indigence by providing insufficient financial evidence and making conscious choices to prioritize other debts over legal fees, and was capable of self-representation despite the case's complexity and his health claims (heart attack, ADHD).
The application for a Rowbotham order was dismissed.