The Court, on its own motion, considered whether to issue a confidentiality order to protect the self-represented appellant's medical information.
The Court found that the appellant might be under a legal disability and that his medical information had been disclosed to support adjournment requests.
Applying the Sherman Estate test, the Court concluded that court openness posed a serious risk to the appellant's dignity and privacy.
The Court ordered that the files be sealed, with the exception of redacted versions of the confidentiality order and a previous order, until the issue of legal disability is resolved.