The applicant condominium corporation brought a motion to evict the respondent unit owner and force the sale of his unit, alleging he breached a prior Compliance Order and the Condominium Act, 1998.
The applicant relied on evidence from its security manager regarding the respondent's verbal altercations with staff and social media posts.
The court found the applicant's evidence to be largely inadmissible hearsay and highly prejudicial.
While the respondent's behaviour was rude and obnoxious, it did not constitute a breach of the Act or contempt of the Compliance Order.
The motion was dismissed without costs, subject to terms including the respondent's undertaking to vacate the unit until December 2025 and rent it out.
