The applicant sought to recognize an Israeli guardianship order declaring the respondent incapable of managing property and appointing the applicant as his guardian.
The respondent, who resides in Israel, holds personal property in Ontario.
The court found that while the Substitute Decisions Act does not list Israel as a prescribed jurisdiction for resealing, the order could be recognized under common law principles.
The court dispensed with service on the respondent and involvement of the Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee, finding a real and substantial connection to Israel and no violation of natural justice or public policy.
The application was granted.
