This decision addresses the issue of credibility and reliability in a sexual assault trial where the accused, Benedict Okolie, was charged with sexual assault against Ms. A.A. The court carefully analyzed the conflicting testimonies of the complainant and the accused, emphasizing the high burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt and the presumption of innocence.
The judge found significant inconsistencies in the complainant’s evidence, particularly regarding her level of intoxication and behavior during the incident, which could not be reconciled with the video evidence.
The accused’s testimony was largely consistent, though some parts were rejected.
Ultimately, the court was unable to conclude guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and acquitted the accused.
