The accused brought a certiorari application seeking to quash a committal for trial following a preliminary inquiry, arguing that the preliminary inquiry judge lost jurisdiction by refusing a requested adjournment after counsel was discharged.
The reviewing court examined the procedural history, including numerous adjournments and opportunities afforded to the accused to retain counsel.
The court held that the preliminary inquiry judge acted within jurisdiction and exercised appropriate control of the proceedings.
There was ample evidentiary basis for committal and no breach of natural justice or procedural fairness.
The application to quash the committal was dismissed.
