This motion to change sought to vary a 2011 order regarding child and spousal support and s. 7 university expenses.
The applicant, Mr. Cinar, claimed overpayments of child support due to the child's university attendance and sought reimbursement for his share of university expenses.
The court found that Mr. Cinar had overpaid child support by several amounts and that the respondent, Ms. Cinar, was obligated to pay $18,000 for her share of s. 7 university expenses.
The court did not order direct reimbursement for the overpaid child support but made findings of overpayment and Ms. Cinar's obligation.
The case highlighted the procedural complexities arising from fragmented family law jurisdiction.
