The respondent mother brought a motion seeking 23 heads of relief, primarily alleging that the applicant father breached the parenting time and therapy provisions of their Minutes of Settlement regarding their two adult children with disabilities.
The father brought a cross-motion to strike the mother's affidavit evidence under Rule 1(8.2) of the Family Law Rules, arguing it was inflammatory and irrelevant.
The court found that the father had not done enough to facilitate the parenting schedule for the younger child and ordered him to take specific affirmative steps to ensure compliance and support reunification therapy.
The father's motion to strike was dismissed as moot, as the impugned forms are presumptively inadmissible at trial.
