This is a costs decision following a temporary order on a motion for the return of a child to the applicant's home.
The motion also sought orders for temporary custody, child support, alternate weekend access, and school enrollment.
The respondent father was the successful party on the central issues of the child's primary residence and school enrollment.
The applicant mother argued there was divided success and that the respondent's conduct in involving police and Children's Aid Society before communicating with her was unreasonable.
The court found the respondent's conduct was not unreasonable and awarded costs at 60% of the respondent's bill rather than full recovery, considering the nature of the issues and the need for the motion.
