Mr. Temple

The appellant police officer appealed a conviction for discreditable conduct for engaging in a secondary occupation (operating a farm feed store) without the Commissioner's consent, contrary to section 61 of Regulation 791 under the Police Act.

The appellant argued the regulation was discriminatory and violated sections 6(2) and 15 of the Charter.

Relying on a previous decision involving the same arguments, the Ontario Civilian Police Commission dismissed the appeal and confirmed the penalty of forfeiture of three vacation days.

The appellant police officer appealed a conviction for discreditable conduct for engaging in secondary employment as a painter without the Commissioner's consent, contrary to section 61 of Regulation 791 under the Police Act.

The appellant argued the regulation was discriminatory, violated common law, and infringed sections 6(2) and 15 of the Charter.

The Ontario Civilian Police Commission dismissed the appeal, relying on its previous decisions upholding the regulation, and confirmed the penalty of forfeiture of three days' vacation.

The appellant police officer appealed a disciplinary conviction and penalty of three forfeited vacation days for engaging in secondary employment without the Commissioner's consent, contrary to Section 61 of Regulation 791 under the Police Act.

The appellant argued that the regulation was discriminatory and violated sections 6(2) and 15 of the Charter.

The Ontario Civilian Police Commission rejected the Charter arguments, relying on its previous decisions, and dismissed the appeal, confirming the penalty.