The parties brought cross-motions regarding temporary care of their children, spousal support, and exclusive possession of the matrimonial home.
The father sought an equal shared parenting schedule to align with his shift work, while the mother sought temporary spousal support and exclusive possession of the home.
The court dismissed both motions, maintaining the status quo of the children residing primarily with the mother for five out of eight nights.
The court also declined to award spousal support due to minimal income disparity and dismissed the request for exclusive possession as the father had voluntarily vacated the home without disturbing the mother's possession.
