The applicant sought to bring a motion to change a final order concerning a high-conflict family matter, specifically regarding reunification therapy for the child, N.L. The motion was dismissed due to lack of proper service on the respondent.
The court emphasized the critical importance of the child's emotional well-being and the need for the parties to cooperate with therapeutic recommendations, noting that the previous reunification therapy was cancelled due to alleged interference.
The court also clarified its ongoing jurisdiction over contempt and change motions in this case.
