The Crown sought to adduce two statements made by the defendant during a motor vehicle accident investigation: (1) that a parked car was not present when she parked, and (2) that damage to her vehicle was sustained six months prior.
The defendant challenged the voluntariness of these statements, arguing she felt obligated to answer police questions.
The court conducted a voir dire and found that the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that both statements were made voluntarily and admitted them into evidence.
