In a high-net-worth family law dispute, both parties brought motions.
The respondent wife sought interim support, interim disbursements, further financial disclosure, and an order striking the applicant husband's pleadings for non-compliance with a prior order.
The husband sought to vary the prior order.
The court found the husband's financial evidence evasive and imputed income based on his historical lifestyle funded by alleged loans from his father.
The court ordered the husband to pay $50,000 per month in uncharacterized interim support and to provide the requested corporate disclosure.
The court declined to strike the husband's pleadings immediately but imposed a strict deadline for compliance, and dismissed the wife's request for interim disbursements without prejudice.
