The appellant appealed his summary conviction and sentence for fraud under $5,000, arising from the installation of a skimming device on an ATM.
The appellant argued the verdict was unreasonable based on circumstantial evidence, the trial judge misapprehended the evidence, the reasons were insufficient, and a discharge should have been granted.
The summary conviction appeal court dismissed the appeal, finding the trial judge's reasons were sufficient, the verdict was reasonable and supported by the evidence, and the sentence was fit and not contrary to the public interest.
