Following a successful motion by the plaintiff to amend its Statement of Claim to correct a misnomer, the parties made written submissions on costs.
The plaintiff sought partial indemnity costs, arguing the defendants unreasonably opposed the motion.
The defendants argued they should receive costs or costs should be in the cause due to the plaintiff's delay.
The court found the plaintiff's requested costs reasonable, noting the defendants should have consented to the misnomer correction, and awarded the plaintiff $2,551.31 in partial indemnity costs.
