The parties, who share joint custody of their six-year-old child, disagreed on where the child should attend grade one.
The mother proposed a French language school midway between their residences, while the father proposed a French immersion school near his home in Kanata.
The court considered the child's best interests, including the father's disability, transportation logistics, and the parties' respective work schedules.
The court ordered the child to attend the father's proposed school, finding it better accommodated the father's needs and reduced overall travel time, while still meeting the child's linguistic needs.
