The applicant sought judicial interim release (bail) on multiple charges including fraud related to forged prescriptions, domestic assault, robbery, and breach of recognizance.
The Crown opposed release on secondary grounds, arguing detention was necessary for public protection.
The court granted bail with strict conditions including house arrest, electronic monitoring, and three sureties (the applicant's mother, sister, and father).
The court found that while the applicant's pattern of offending was serious and involved substance abuse, the proposed plan with robust supervision and electronic monitoring sufficiently mitigated the risk to public safety.
