On a motion to change, the moving party sought termination or reduction of child support based on retirement and a substantial drop in income to CPP and OAS benefits.
The court found a material change in circumstances and varied support retroactively to reflect guideline support on the reduced income.
The court held that one adult child ceased to be entitled to support upon leaving university and that the other ceased to be entitled upon not pursuing further full-time education after high school.
The evidence of an Autism Level 1 diagnosis did not establish inability to withdraw from parental charge within s. 31 of the Family Law Act.
The motion was granted in part and no costs were ordered.
