On an interim motion in a parenting dispute, the respondent father sought an order establishing an alternating-week parenting schedule for the parties’ two children pending trial.
The mother opposed the change, arguing that the existing primary-residence arrangement constituted a status quo that should not be disturbed.
Evidence from the Office of the Children’s Lawyer and its clinical investigator indicated that the children, who were of sufficient maturity, clearly expressed a preference to spend equal time with each parent and were affected by ongoing parental conflict over access.
The court held that although preservation of the status quo is a relevant consideration on interim motions, it is not an immutable principle and must yield to the children’s best interests.
Finding that an alternating-week schedule would provide greater certainty, reduce parental conflict, and reflect the children’s wishes without significantly disrupting their routines, the court granted the interim order.
