The appellant appealed his conviction for possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking and his sentence.
He argued that the search warrant was invalid due to a defect in the copy and omissions in the information provided by confidential informants.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the conviction appeal, finding the warrant valid and the conviction supported by physical and expert evidence.
The sentence appeal was also dismissed, as the sentence was appropriate given the appellant's extensive record and a conditional sentence was not warranted.
