The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.
The respondent denied two treatment plans for chiropractic services on the basis that the applicant's injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).
The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to prove his injuries warranted removal from the MIG.
However, the Tribunal determined that the respondent's denial notice for the first treatment plan was non-compliant with s. 38(8) of the Schedule, rendering those expenses payable under s. 38(11).
The denial notice for the second treatment plan was compliant, and thus it was not payable.
The applicant's claim for an award was dismissed.
