This decision addresses two applications for a stay of proceedings under section 11(b) of the Charter for unreasonable delay, brought by two co-accused charged with sexual assault.
The court determined that the 18-month presumptive ceiling for provincial court matters applied, rather than the 30-month ceiling for cases with a preliminary inquiry, because the scheduled preliminary inquiry was not completed due to the Crown withdrawing preliminary inquiry-eligible counts and consenting to re-election to the Ontario Court of Justice.
The court found that the Crown's tactical decision not to seek an 11(b) waiver at the time of re-election was significant.
After calculating the total delay and deducting periods attributable to defence counsel unavailability and a specific period of COVID-19 related backlog (92 days for trial scheduling and judicial pre-trial scheduling), the net delay for both accused exceeded the 18-month ceiling (19.75 months for one, 20 months for the other).
Consequently, the court ordered a stay of proceedings for both accused.