The moving party sought a non‑removal order preventing the custodial parent from travelling with the child to Dubai and also sought changes to the pickup and drop‑off arrangements for access.
The court declined to make a blanket prohibition or authorization regarding international travel because no specific travel plan was before the court and circumstances could change.
The existing order requiring travel notice remained in force, though the notice period for travel to Dubai was extended to 90 days due to concerns associated with a non‑Hague Convention destination.
The court varied the access exchange terms, requiring the parties to conduct weekend exchanges in Kingston to more fairly distribute travel burdens and facilitate the child's relationship with the moving parent.
