The appellant father appealed a trial judge's order placing one child in extended Society care and two children in the custody of their paternal aunt.
The appellant argued the trial judge erred in applying the test for care and custody under the Child, Youth and Family Services Act, and made evidentiary errors regarding treatment records, hearsay evidence, and case notes.
The Superior Court of Justice found no palpable and overriding errors or errors in principle in the trial judge's decision.
The appeal was dismissed, subject to a consent variation regarding access.
