The applicant sought a stay of a Board order revoking its liquor licence pending an appeal.
The Board had revoked the licence after finding the applicant allowed drug sales and drunkenness on the premises.
The applicant argued it should have been allowed to introduce fresh evidence at the Board hearing.
The Divisional Court dismissed the motion for a stay, finding the applicant failed to meet the three-part RJR-MacDonald test, particularly failing to establish irreparable harm and that the balance of convenience favoured a stay.
