The moving party sought leave to appeal an order that set aside a Mareva injunction but declined to do so on the basis of material non-disclosure, and which did not preclude the responding party from bringing a fresh motion for injunctive relief.
The moving party also sought leave to appeal the costs disposition.
The Divisional Court dismissed the motion, finding that the moving party failed to meet the strict test for leave to appeal under Rule 62.02(4) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, as there was no conflicting decision and the proposed appeal did not involve matters of general or public importance.
