The parties brought cross-motions to change support obligations set out in their 2003 Separation Agreement.
The respondent sought to terminate spousal support after losing his job, while the applicant sought retroactive child support and increased spousal support.
The court found a material change in circumstances due to the respondent's unemployment and the applicant's new employment.
The court terminated spousal support immediately and dismissed the applicant's claims for retroactive child and spousal support.
