Michelle Isenstein

The court dismissed the plaintiff’s action as frivolous under rule 2.1.01 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

The statement of claim failed to articulate a legally recognized cause of action or material facts supporting a claim against the defendant.

The plaintiff did not provide submissions when invited to do so.

The court found the claim to be devoid of merit and an abuse of process, and dismissed the action without costs.

The court dismissed the plaintiff’s action as frivolous under rule 2.1.01 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

The plaintiff, Shaukat Ali, failed to plead a cause of action or provide material facts supporting a claim against the defendant, Peel Police (11 Division).

The court found the claim lacked legal merit and reasonable grounds, and the plaintiff did not respond to an invitation to provide submissions.

The action was dismissed without costs.

The applicant sought to enforce a judgment of the Jerusalem Court of Family Affairs regarding an estate settlement, which entitled her to approximately $1 million held by the Ontario court.

A law firm objected and moved for standing, asserting a right to $25,000 in unpaid legal fees from the funds, based on an irrevocable direction signed by the deceased's widow.

The court adjourned the application and motion sine die, directing the parties to attempt to resolve the fee dispute honourably before proceeding with further litigation.