The applicant brought a motion seeking enforcement of a parenting coordination provision contained in a previously executed separation agreement.
The agreement required the parties to retain a named parenting coordinator and complete the intake process, but the respondent refused to comply and argued that communication difficulties and financial hardship justified varying the agreement.
The court held that the respondent failed to establish any material change in circumstances or provide updated financial evidence to support her position.
The court found the agreement had been negotiated with counsel and remained in the child’s best interests.
The motion was granted, requiring the respondent to complete the intake process and pay her share of the parenting coordinator retainer.
