The moving party brought a motion for interim child and spousal support, including retroactive support.
The parties had a shared custody arrangement for one child, while another child resided primarily with the responding party.
The court ordered the responding party to pay interim child support based on his employment income, with adjustments for the changing custody arrangements over time.
The court also found the moving party had established a prima facie case for interim spousal support due to her medical condition and financial dependency, ordering support in the mid-range of the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines.
