The appellant appealed a summary judgment in favour of the respondent bank for a credit card debt and the dismissal of his counterclaim.
The appellant argued that documents he sent to the bank constituted an accord and satisfaction.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the motion judge that the appellant could not unilaterally dictate the terms of repayment and finding no procedural unfairness in the denial of cross-examination where no notice of examination was served.
