The tenants appealed an order of the Landlord and Tenant Board terminating their tenancy and ordering eviction.
The Board found that the tenant substantially interfered with the landlord's reasonable enjoyment by repeatedly refusing entry to real estate agents, engaging in abusive behaviour, and sending threatening emails.
The tenant argued the Board erred by basing the eviction solely on his refusal to allow photographs of the unit and alleged bias.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding the tenant could not raise new issues not presented to the Board, the eviction was based on a broader pattern of conduct, and there was no evidence of bias.