At a case conference in a commercial lease dispute, the court established a timetable for steps leading up to the plaintiff's summary judgment motion and the defendants' Rule 21 motion.
The court declined to rule on other substantive issues, such as demands for particulars and further affidavits of documents, noting they required a proper evidentiary record and formal motions.
The ordered timetable incorporated a two-week extension to the plaintiff's proposal to accommodate defense counsel's schedule.