The respondent brought a motion to stay three interlocutory orders pending leave to appeal and to consolidate the notices of motion for leave to appeal.
The court found that the order for the payment of money was automatically stayed under Rule 63.01.
However, the court dismissed the motion to stay the other two procedural orders, finding the respondent failed to establish a serious issue, irreparable harm, or balance of convenience.
The motion to consolidate was also dismissed as it would cause confusion.
Costs of $3,500 were awarded to the applicant.
