The respondent brought a motion for the partition and sale of the matrimonial home, which the applicant opposed, alleging malicious, vexatious, or oppressive conduct and hardship.
The court found no such conduct or hardship related to the home and granted the order for sale.
The court also addressed spousal support, imputing the respondent's income at $85,000 due to incomplete disclosure and ordering temporary spousal support at the higher end of the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines range, considering the applicant's disabilities and needs.