The applicant father brought a motion for a temporary week-about shared parenting schedule for the parties' six-year-old child during the summer months.
The respondent mother opposed the motion, arguing for the continuation of the status quo of three weekends per month.
The court granted the father's motion, finding that a shared parenting schedule during the summer was in the child's best interests and consistent with the maximum contact principle, as it would not interfere with the child's school schedule and would reduce transitions.
The court declined to reduce the father's child support obligations for the two-month period.
