Defendant awarded lump sum costs of 20% of fees plus reasonable disbursements following successful trial defense.
Following a trial where the Crown successfully defended against the plaintiff's claims for restitution and declaratory relief, the parties could not agree on costs.
The Federal Court rejected the plaintiff's argument for divided success, finding the Crown entirely successful on the primary issues.
The Court ordered lump sum costs, concluding the Tariff would be inadequate, and awarded the Crown 20% of its legal fees ($1,263,623.13) plus most of its disbursements ($371,951.95), totaling $1,635,575.08.
CPRC's claim for tax recovery based on 1880 Contract exemption dismissed as Kingstreet remedy inapplicable.
The Canadian Pacific Railway Company sought recovery of Income Tax, Large Corporations Tax, and Fuel Tax, arguing that Clause 16 of the 1880 Contract between CPRC and the federal government exempted it from these taxes.
The Court determined that Clause 16 has statutory and contractual force, but no constitutional force.
Applying contractual interpretation principles, the Court held that Clause 16 applies to the Large Corporations Tax, but not to Income Tax or Fuel Tax.
However, the Court found that the Kingstreet restitutionary remedy did not apply, as the taxes were not levied under an unconstitutional statute.
Consequently, CPRC's claim for recovery and declaratory relief was dismissed.