The proposed intervener brought a motion for leave to intervene in an application for judicial review concerning the refusal of the applicant's electronic travel authorization.
The refusal was based on the applicant's failure to provide documents necessary for an equivalency analysis of criminal charges he faced in Spain.
The Court dismissed the motion, finding that the proposed intervener did not have a sufficient interest and that their participation would not assist in the determination of the issues, as the relevant arguments were already raised by the applicant and the case primarily concerned the reasonableness of the officer's decision regarding document production.
