The applicant father brought a motion to enroll the parties' six-year-old child in a French Immersion program in Mississauga, contrary to the respondent mother's choice of a public school in North York.
The parties shared joint custody under a previous order which gave the mother final decision-making authority over education if they could not agree.
The court found that the mother's proposed school was in the child's best interests, noting the child's speech delays, the mother's proximity to the school, and the availability of before and after school care.
The father's motion regarding the choice of school was dismissed.
