The Ontario Court of Justice struck the applicant mother’s Reply in a family law case for including extensive evidence, contrary to the Family Law Rules which restrict evidence filing in Applications, Answers/Claims, and Replies.
The court emphasized that these pleadings are meant to define issues and claims, not to serve as vehicles for evidence, to ensure fairness, reduce delay, and avoid escalating conflict.
The decision reinforces the procedural boundaries in family law litigation and the importance of adhering to prescribed forms and processes.
