The accused was charged with sexual assault and assault arising from incidents during a deteriorating intimate relationship.
The complainant alleged non-consensual anal intercourse, choking during sexual activity, and several physical assaults during domestic disputes.
The accused denied the allegations and testified that the sexual acts were consensual and that any physical contact was defensive.
Applying the W.(D.) credibility framework, the court accepted the accused’s evidence and found significant inconsistencies and reliability concerns in the complainant’s testimony.
The Crown failed to prove the offences beyond a reasonable doubt, and the accused was acquitted on all remaining counts.
