Marnie Baizley

The applicant filed a human rights application but repeatedly used insulting and profane language towards counsel and the Tribunal.

The Tribunal ordered the applicant to provide a written undertaking to abide by expectations of appropriate conduct and to comply with a publication ban regarding the respondents' identities.

The applicant failed to provide the undertaking and continued to post identifying and inflammatory materials on the internet.

The Tribunal dismissed the application as an abuse of process and as abandoned due to the applicant's ongoing refusal to comply with its directions.

The respondents requested an order prohibiting the applicant from posting information related to the human rights proceedings on the internet and requiring him to remove existing postings.

The Tribunal held an expedited hearing, which the applicant argued was unlawful due to short notice.

The Tribunal rejected this argument, finding the applicant had actual notice and was not prejudiced.

The Tribunal found that the applicant was responsible for internet postings containing inflammatory and irrelevant assertions about the respondents.

To protect the integrity of the process and prevent intimidation, the Tribunal ordered a publication ban on the names of individual respondents and individuals named in the materials.

Due to the applicant's abusive and profane conduct during the hearing, the Tribunal also ordered him to provide a written undertaking to abide by appropriate conduct expectations, failing which the Application may be dismissed as an abuse of process.