The appellant appealed from a conviction and sentence for sexual exploitation.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the conviction appeal, finding ample evidence for a reasonable trier to convict in what was primarily a credibility case.
On the sentence appeal, the Court found the sentencing judge erred in attributing the complainant's weight gain to the sexual exploitation without new evidence, but ultimately concluded the sentence imposed was fit and appropriate.
Leave to appeal sentence was granted, but the appeal was dismissed.
